Thursday, November 14, 2013

Canadian Festival of Spoken Word 2013


So I know I’m supposed to talk about one specific artist, and why their work excites me- but seriously, seriously, I can’t think of a more inspirational and transformation art experience (that I JUST HAD) at the Canadian Festival of Spoken Word in Montreal this past November.
So quick backstory- I just spent the month of October performing in a play by playwright/poet/mc- Donna Michelle St. Bernard. The play was titled, A Man A Fish, it was an amazing experience- because the script, the words in the play were so heightened and poetic that I was essentially immersed in a month long study of an epic poem. The day after the show closed I was on a flight to Montreal- to an even bigger epic poem experience.
The Canadian Festival of Spoken Word is run under the auspice of SPOCAN: Spoken Word Canada, the national organization that fosters growth and development of and within the Spoken Word Community. Up until now, I’d thought of spoken word as small cafés with tiny stages where poets would share their words to snaps and claps, or under street lights, and in other moody speak easies. I’d been privy to any number of Def Poetry Jam episodes on youtube, and Upworthy videos on Facebook, etc. but discovering this sizeable organization of poet elders and young poet activists pushing the limits of the artform, and mindfully maintaining the importance to openness and acceptance in the community was awe inspiring.
With this post, I’m going to highlight a few artists/events and performances that really changed my perspective, and opened up ideas and possibilities for this type of work. I’m hoping to somehow process this and incorporate it into my thesis. OK, so let’s do this…
First I’m going to talk about- the workshops. OMG the workshops. I was left thirsty because I was just NOT having it. The first workshop I attended was “safe(r) spaces” facilitated by the amazing Ryan Thom, a trans identified poet/performance artist, who I am in talks with collaborating with in the near future, and Janice Lee, a renound poet from my old hood in Kitchener-Waterloo, Ontario. These lovely people worked hard to promote an open and safe space where the bathrooms were gender neutral, you could speak in English, French, or ANY language you wanted- even if it meant that NO one else could understand you.
A huge chunk of the beginning was establishing ground rules of respect and understanding- and that there were always people ready to listen to us if something in the workshop triggered us. Then came the round circle introductions. I’m always amazed at how soft spoken and shy some artists can be. I of course, was loud, brimming with energy and this may or may not have served well in this environment. But enough play by play, the heart of the workshop was problematic for me. At the core, the discussion was on creating safer spaces- especially in slam environments and new slam communities- with a focus on supporting and fostering new poets.
A significant amount of time was spent on shared (horror) stories of racially, sexually, discriminatorily bent performances in past events where audiences did not react well, and some of the challenges faced by the host/moderators who had to either step in or manage the situation. I felt like too much time was spent on validating the challenges of people facing a hard time, and not enough time was spent on speaking about the issues and how to deal with them.
We moved into a role playing scenario, and my benefit of the doubt was… given, to a semi-improvised scene where “actor A” portrayed a trans audience member who spoke to “actor B” about a fictitious performance she gave- where she essentially excluded trans-identified females. It was tough to watch, and tough to take it- because there was no time to debrief. We committed to discussing the issue further, talking about what strategies could be used to help that situation, and broke into two groups. Unfortunately, the groups were divided by experience (those who had been running spoken word events and programs, and new comers to the scene). Both groups began speaking in another round table of sharing where we “were” how we were doing, what we were feeling. That unfortunately took up the rest of the workshop.
Was it beneficial? Absolutely. Ryan and Janice were fantastic at listening, mediating, and facilitating. Unfortunately we never got INTO the discussion- and much of the session was spent on story telling of traumatic experiences. So why am I talking about this sessions so much. Because the core of this workshop strikes the heart of what I want to talk about. The point where catharsis meets art, and focusing on the artform of spoken word. Spoken Word is a style and practice that, quite frankly, CELEBRATES struggle/difference/trauma. In a later workshop, Poet/Facilitator/Elder/Saskatoonian- Louise Halfe spoke on writing past fear, and beautifully summed up that the act of Spoken Word and Writing can be a beautiful process of release but it is NOT the same as healing. Because if we do NOT reframe, transform, and change our behavior/patterns/situation- it will be a continual cycle of catharsis and repetition of trauma.
I voiced my frustration, anger, and essential intolerance of the Safe(r) Space workshop when it was my turn to speak- saying that I believe this is an artform, and that what we seemed to be talking about was how to reframe and communicate feedback and manage tough situations- which was not the same thing. This was met with positive feedback, and also some… stiff spines.
When it comes to safe space and inclusivity- with my experience working with social advocacy groups etc. I am very opinionated. I began my work- deeply aware of my ‘otherness’ and my sense of displacement and came from a place of discrimination and intolerance. My goal for this week was to not speak, to listen, and take time to learn and hear what other people had to say- and I left… thirsty- wanting more.
And then I found it. In the form of epid DADA poet, and Spoken Word BIG LEAGUE- Sheri D. Wilson. I hit the street screaming, indignant at my experience, voicing it to my team mates and colleagues as we strode away…. Only to run into Sheri-D. I had no idea who this person was. But her first words were “I couldn’t go into that workshop because… I don’t believe in safe spaces. I think poetry and Spoken Word is inherently UNSAFE. We push the boundaries, we speak what needs to be said.” Sheri-D. and I hit it off- sort of. I was on a tirade, and vehemently agreed with her, but also staunchly struggled with the ideas that THIS WAS ART, this is performance- my years of theatre pedagogy came spewing- demanding for presence, integrity, transformation, as opposed to catharsis and validation for traumas that did not need to be Relived, but recognizing that they needed to be (re)told.
She dragged me to a listening party- where, as the living icon that she was, was impromptu-ly asked to sit on the panel- where the artists SPOKE about the word and the performance, and recording, and viability of the craft. This was so satisfying and refreshing. It was my first taste of the ROOTS of this craft, and the vitality and the legacy that we come from.
For the first time- I realized what it means to choose your history. I don’t know if I was meant to be a poetry slammer, but I do know that I was meant to write, speak and more than anything else- perform. I clued into the reality that this artform that I have fallen into holds a legacy that I am now a part of. My supervisor, prof, mentor, and ass-kicking-whereisyourhomework-teacher said to me “Johnny- you are indeed a spoken word artist, and of COURSE you need to incorporate this into your thesis and final product.” This terrified the Heck out of me because I felt like I had NO idea where I came from. Now I know more. Now I’m ready to do more.
In the listening party workshop, artists commented on the difference between live performance vs studio recording. Of course- I chimed in- what I wanted to say, and was trying to say, because of all my grad school crit and theory was backing me up- what if- we recognized that our studio persona, and recorded work represented- simply- another narrative, that it was a persona unto itself- and if we just GOT out of our own way, and stopped trying to recreate or force the sense of live performance aesthetic we could create something.
I was slightly misheard- and got into a relatively intense discussion with- non other than- TANYA EVANS. Like a bull in a china shop, that’s what I am. It took a few seconds of discussion to realize that we were saying the same thing differently. She bee-lined to me after the workshop- while Sheri-D dragged me to her. Because… what I didn’t realize was: Sheri-D founded- FOUNDED- the SPOKEN WORD INTENSIVE at the BANFF CENTRE FOR THE ARTS- the program that I am APPLYING TO for a week of study in Spoken Word………. And Tanya Evans… just happens to be the current director.
My personal performances that week- well received. I was devastated by the arbitrary and subjective point systems which lead to my team losing our bouts, and realized how during the day- outside of performance- artists were just trying to be HEARD. My vocal outcries and opinions on the work garnered VERY MODEST attention, but lead to key figures wanting to hear me spit. This was humbling, and encouraging. In the evenings- I was terrified because some of the artists were screaming, shouting, and ripping out their bare, broken, shredded souls on stage to have anonymous judges validate with random number scores. AWKWARD. I understand better now. But I can’t help the part of me that is competitive and still wants to WIN. Ugh.
I finish off this LONG post with something that inspired me, and is driving me to engage more in this community. The conference was lovely. BUT there was such an Emphasis on the WRITING. But Spoken Word is an artform that unifies both Speaking and Writing. Frankly- the word “Spoken” comes first. After my year of study and practice as an artist- I’ve had numerous opportunities and engagements to coach and develop the performance aspect, which I love. I coached my team, and some of the pieces I was able to work on even scored an arbitrary/subjective 10/10. All the pieces I worked on within my team however… received great feedback from my team. It meant a lot that I was able to help them, and they valued my input. 13 years of ‘formal’ post-secondary performance training has to be useful for something right?
Here is a post of a video of a highlight from CFSW 2013. By poet and new friend Aaron Sim- about his discovery of Disney producing an amusement park in Baghdad. OMG.

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

Camille Utterback is awesome because...


Camille Utterback
Why she is awesome:
1999. While people contemplated the falling sky- Camille Utterback contemplated the catching and falling of words and translated that into Text Rain. (http://camilleutterback.com/projects/text-rain/). Text Rain was an art interactive art installation Utterback created a light sensitive projection that used motion sensors to read the shifting light patterns as patrons entered her installation. The light patterns were connected to a projector that showed the images of falling letters, seemingly random, but formed the lines of a poem. Depending on the level of darkness, the letters essentially rested on the silhouettes of patrons. Patrons (users) were able to manipulate the letters as they moved, and as soon as they moved beyond the range of the sensors (or as soon as they could no longer cast a shadow), the letters continued to fall to the ground.
In terms of interactivity, and actually engaging audience/attendees with interdisciplinary art- Text Rain was able to accomplish two goals that I would love to see in my work: 1) using video projections in a more (inter)active way and 2) demanding audience engagement, so that their physical presence and movements through the space directly impact what happens to the “art” in the space. Being a theatre practitioner, I’ve had the opportunity to see a lot of shows, lives performances, etc. Beyond the role of sedentary spectators who have been trained to applaud, laugh, cry, hiss, boo a performance- the opportunities that Utterback explored, showed a great deal of possibility for what we can do now.
From the video footage, it appears that upon first entering the space, audience members didn’t realize how the installation would be affected by them, but from the various video clips, it’s apparent that as soon as the opportunity presented itself, there was created a “state of play.”
A personal bias of mine… I guess I’m just tired of arbitrary use of projections in theatre. We get it, technology is there to be used, and sometimes it’s cheaper and easier than building a bunch of flying set pieces. Furthermore, I pretty much exclusively use projected images to frame my shows and performances. But I guess here is where my hypocrisy diverges. I use projections in tandem with other electronic and mobile devices in an almost Brechtian way, where I constantly want to audience to be aware of the technology, and yet still be immersed in the narrative story/experience. I use projected images because I have an affinity to the aesthetic of images projected onto a wall, onto a body, displayed on a screen. I just want to recognize how technology is an extension of who we are in how we tell stories- and it’s a way to bring social media (instagram/vine/facebook) into a physical space. Perhaps a poor attempt- it’s my way of opening a portal to welcome in multiple layers of personal narrative and interactivity into one single moment. What I mean is- we exists internally, externally, physically, and virtually- we are each our own hub to hundreds of connections with varying degrees of intimacy and relevance. I want to bring them all to the forefront in a single performative experience.
The other reason I love Text Rain, because I’m trying not to go on too much of a rant is of course, the poetry.  Since 1999, other artists, students, etc. have explored this piece further. One artist, Sam Gruber (http://golancourses.net/2013/projects/samgruberupkittextrain/) re-implement the project to have the letters interact to crisper edges and lines in the projection as opposed to a brightness threshold which is how the original piece worked. In the link above, he is able to display the poetry within the projection:
“String[] poem = {   "I like talking with you,",   "simply that: conversing,",   "a turning-with or -around,",   "as in your turning around",   "to face me suddenly . . .",   "At your turning, each part",   "of my body turns to verb.",   "We are the opposite",   "of tongue-tied, if there",   "were such an antonym;",   "We are synonyms",   "for limbs' loosening",   "of syntax.",   "and yet turn to nothing:",   "It's just talk." };”


            What I love about Text Rain is that- especially with the use of poetry, as you interact with the art piece, you become the performer within your own show, but also, one is often left looking for words. From the random collection or coalescence of words as they rest on your forehead or shoulder, fragments of meaning that ultimately mean different things to different participants are communicated. So in a public environment, these individual experiences are unique to each person. This of course can be argued… for any experience anywhere- but what I mean is that- I think that these specific words, and word choices create unique images and frame/reflect the individual memories of each person who walks into the installation.
           
            This is how I feel about poetry. As a budding Spoken Word/Slam Poet, and having immersed myself into the Poet Community, I realize that the stylized performances with super heightened text, rapid delivery, rhythmic breathing are tools that break up the streams of conscious thought, that spew from the poets’ mouths. As audience members, you are only ever able to collect certain images and ideas, and leave with limited fragments of the piece- which is why we come back and listen again, and why there is a strong sense of ritual and appreciation for the live aspects of the performance.
           
            I’m just glad I was able to discover artists like Utterback, and pieces like Text Rain. For the first time in a long time, researching and learning about this piece leaves me more inspired to create as opposed to feelings of being unoriginal or redundant. I hope to utilize the projection aspects of this piece, and the use of animated words to heighten my live performance for Rice in Hybridity.